New Employee Confronts Recruiter After Onboarding Process Ignores Prior Commitments

When we think of the ideal job, it often comes tethered to hopes of clear communication, honesty, and mutual respect between the employer and the employee. However, a recent account from a Redditor on the r/antiwork subreddit paints a starkly different picture, cautioning job seekers to be wary of too-good-to-be-true offers.

The new employee, excitedly hired for what seemed like the perfect tutoring side gig, soon found themselves entangled in a web of logistical inconsistencies and communication breakdowns. Despite assurances about location and working hours, reality took a sharp and unexpected detour. Imagine being promised a position in a nearby school district only to be allocated somewhere a half-hour away. Or expecting a 10-hour workweek but being scheduled for a mere 3 to 4 hours.

While some might argue that mistakes happen and miscommunications occur, the Redditor’s attempt to confront the recruiter about these workplace issues was met with vague promises and an unsettling silence. The story serves as a stark reminder: always ensure the specifics of a job are in writing and be prepared to stand your ground.

As readers and fellow employees, we’re left pondering: How often do such misleading onboarding practices occur? And when they do, should one stick around hoping for change or make a swift exit? Whether you’re in the job market or have been stably employed for years, this tale from r/antiwork is a must-read, if only to arm oneself against potential professional pitfalls.


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

Nate

Nate Armbruster

When he's not doomscrolling Twitter or writing for Pleated-Jeans, Nate Armbruster writes jokes—and then tells them on stage as a stand-up comedian, where he can watch audiences (hopefully) laugh in real-time.