Alex Buscemi
When marrying into a family, it isn’t wise to challenge their longstanding traditions — especially if you’re still newly married.
But that didn’t stop this woman’s brother-in-law from being extremely entitled — and vocal — during a weekly family dinner.
As the siblings gathered with their children and father for the buffet-style feast, which they hold every weekend, the children were invited to get their food first. But brother-in-law Dan wasn’t having it — he believed the men should fill their plates first as they spend all day “slaving away.”
The woman quickly put Dan in his place. But now she’s wondering if she was too harsh on her hangry brother-in-law. So she asked Reddit who they believed was in the wrong.
Keep going for the full story and the final ruling from the court of public opinion.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. The internet overwhelmingly sided with OP, arguing that Dan had no right to make demands as a newbie to the family — especially demands so petty
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32. A rare few commenters played devil’s advocate, wondering if perhaps Dan had came from a culture where the men are served first
33.
34.
35.
